
Their primary grouse which compelled them to join the ruling coalition was a lack of funds for carrying out developmental works in their respective constituencies.
However, a three-year data accessed from the central government’s MPLADS website has revealed that the six Shiv Sena (UBT) MPs who recently defected to the rival Shiv Sena had spent between 1.07% and 26.84% of the composite kitty allocated to them over a period of three years to execute government approved schemes and projects.
Each MP gets ₹5 crore every year under the Member of Parliament Local Area Development Scheme (MPLADS) from central government, to enable them to recommend developmental work in their constituencies with an emphasis on creating durable community assets based on local needs. If a fund is not utilised, the balance is carried forward and added to the allocation for the next financial year.
Ashtikar said the figures (on the portal) are misunderstood and that there is no connection between the annual kitty allocated and the development works discussed. “We get ₹5 crore each year in MP funds, which is too small for a Lok Sabha constituency comprising six assembly constituencies. When we spoke about the development works and funds earlier, we were referring to projects from DPDC (district planning and development committee) and state government’s schemes – crores are required for a single project which is not possible without the support from the ruling side,” said Ashtikar.
Countering the report, Nimbalkar said, “It is unfair to analyse my work over just two years as I have used 100% of the funds allocated for my constituency between 2019-24. The fund allocation shown in MPLADS report is of three financial years since 2024.”
HT’s calls and messages to the other four MPs went unanswered.
Slamming the six rebel MPs over the report, Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Sanjay Raut said: “The data clearly shows how the MPs failed to utilise the MPLADS funds. Funds amounting to ₹14 crore are unspent. Who had stopped them from using the funds? And now, for which fund have they switched their allegiance?”