© 2026 nimisham.in
Former Shark Tank India judge Ashneer Grover has hit back at an X user who suggested that he donate his estimated Rs 900 crore fortune following controversial comments made by his wife, Madhuri Jain Grover, on wealth, poverty and family size. The exchange came Former Shark Tank India judge Ashneer Grover has hit back at an X user who suggested that he donate his estimated Rs 900 crore fortune following controversial comments made by his wife, Madhuri Jain...
Former Shark Tank India judge Ashneer Grover has hit back at an X user who suggested that he donate his estimated Rs 900 crore fortune following controversial comments made by his wife, Madhuri Jain Grover, on wealth, poverty and family size. The exchange came after Madhuri Jain Grover's remarks on the reality show Lock Upp 2 sparked a heated debate online, with many social media users accusing her of oversimplifying poverty and speaking from a position of privilege. What did Madhuri Jain Grover say? During an appearance on Lock Upp 2, Madhuri Jain Grover shared that she and Ashneer Grover had wanted to have a third child but were unable to do so. She then spoke about family size, saying that many affluent families have three children and that the Hum Do, Humare Do concept does not apply to everyone. Her remarks drew criticism after she suggested that wealthy people who have more children become wealthier, while poor families with more children become poorer. The comments quickly went viral, with many users arguing that poverty is influenced by factors such as access to education, employment opportunities and resources—not merely the number of children in a family. X user asks Ashneer Grover to donate Rs 900 crore Amid the online backlash, content creator Nalini Unagar tagged Ashneer Grover on X and questioned his stance. Referring to his reported net worth of around Rs 900 crore, she asked why he would preserve such wealth for only two children if he believed that larger families contribute to poverty among the less affluent. She further suggested that he could distribute his wealth among nearly 1,800 families and sarcastically remarked that he could then head to the Himalayas and become a monk. Ashneer Grover's response goes viral Ashneer Grover responded with a trademark one-liner that quickly gained traction on social media. Bheek/chanda maangne ka tareeka thoda casual hai. Biwi ne gyaan de diya hai already... itne mein itna hi milega, Ashneer wrote in the post. His response implied that the donation request was a casual way of asking for money. He also joked that his wife's gyaan (advice) was all that people would get. The comeback soon went viral, with some users praising it as a classic Ashneer Grover response, while others said it failed to address the criticism surrounding Madhuri Jain Grover's remarks. Social media remains divided The controversy has sparked a wider debate on privilege, parenting and economic inequality. Several users argued that blaming poverty on larger families ignores deeper structural issues such as unequal opportunities, limited access to quality education and inadequate social support. Others said Madhuri Jain Grover's comments reflected the perspective of someone from a privileged background and failed to acknowledge the realities faced by millions of low-income families. At the same time, some users defended her, saying that although her wording may have been blunt, her broader point about being financially prepared before having children was valid. Supporters argued that raising children requires long-term financial planning and financial stability, and that this aspect of her comments should not be overlooked. Debate on wealth, poverty and family planning continues What began as a personal revelation on Lock Upp 2 has evolved into a broader social media debate on wealth, privilege, family planning and economic inequality. Ashneer Grover's response added another viral moment to the controversy, but discussions around Madhuri Jain Grover's remarks continue, with opinions sharply divided over whether her comments reflected practical financial advice or an oversimplified view of poverty.