Sai Krishna Murder Ci Nagarajus Drishyam Playbook

What initially appeared to be a missing-person case has now taken a far more serious turn, with the Special Investigation Team (SIT) indicating in its remand report that preliminary findings point to Sai Krishna’s death while in police custody.

According to the SIT, Sai Krishna was apprehended in Markapuram on May 6 and brought to Krishna Lanka Police Station.

However, investigators allege that he was kept in illegal custody and was never produced before a magistrate as mandated by law.

The remand report states that his whereabouts remained unknown after he was taken into custody.

A Sub-Inspector reportedly saw him inside the station between May 6 and May 8, while his mother allegedly told investigators that she saw her son lying unconscious at the police station.

The SIT has further alleged that Sai Krishna succumbed to injuries sustained during custodial assault.

In a startling revelation, investigators claimed that CCTV footage from Krishna Lanka Police Station was deliberately deleted to conceal evidence.

The report notes that no CCTV footage is available for the period between May 1 and June 11, raising serious questions about what transpired during those crucial weeks.

The absence of a body and the alleged destruction of evidence have led some observers and legal commentators to compare the case with the popular film Drishyam, where the protagonist meticulously conceals evidence to evade conviction.

According to legal experts, proving a murder case becomes significantly more challenging when there is no body and no direct visual evidence such as CCTV footage.

The SIT has also alleged that Sai Krishna handed over his mobile phone to then CI Nagaraju upon arriving at the station. Investigators claim Nagaraju failed to produce him before a magistrate.

Perhaps the most sensational allegation in the remand report is that Sai Krishna’s body was dispose of to erase evidence of custodial violence.

Investigators suspect that efforts may have been made either to bury or burn the body, which remains untraced.

The SIT has informed the court that further investigation is required to determine the fate of the remains.

Meanwhile, the SIT has described the case as highly complex and alleged that suspended CI Nagaraju has not been cooperating fully with the investigation, instead providing misleading information that could hamper the probe.

Following his arrest, a Vijayawada court remanded Nagaraju to 14 days of judicial custody until July 8.

While comparisons with Drishyam continue to dominate public discussions, it is important to note that these remain speculative interpretations.

Ultimately, the case will be decided not by theories or cinematic parallels, but by the evidence uncovered by investigators and the conclusions reached in a court of law.

As of now, many observers of the case believe that Nagaraju could be acquitted if investigators fail to produce substantial evidence directly linking him to the alleged homicide.

Tamil Nadu CM Joseph C. Vijay always appears quiet and rarely speaks at length in decision making meetings. He follows that approach for a reason.…

I-PAC’s Rishi Raj Singh was a name that resonated with “power” during the YSRCP rule in Andhra Pradesh. He used to call the shots, and…

Telugu Desam Party president and Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister N Chandrababu Naidu is learnt to have pulled up his cabinet colleagues from the party for…