Vacuum Cleaner Fails In 1 Month Man Wins Rs 29204 Compensation

and deficiency in service, and Rs 10,000 as litigation cost.

“The vacuum cleaner bought by the complainant stopped working within a month. The customer care centre of the 1st opposite party delayed and harassed the complainant. All these are deficiencies in service. This would have given severe mental strain and mental agony to the complainant, the commission said on May 26.

The complainant purchased a vacuum cleaner in February 2025 for Rs 4,204 through Flipkart for his wife. The warranty period was one year. But in March 2025, it stopped working. The complainant then repeatedly approached the brand to rectify the defects.

He alleged that the brand’s customer care personnel caused a delay and did not rectify the issue. He subsequently submitted a petition to the National Consumer Helpline. It was only after that the opposite party (company) came forward to replace the vacuum cleaner with a new one. Since the opposite party caused a delay and committed a deficiency in service, the complainant refused the replacement offer.

It was argued that the product was purchased by one Tina Albert from Kerala, and the complainant is not a consumer. The company claimed that the product was sold in Kerala and the purchaser too lived in the state.

It was submitted that the complainant had not produced any proof that he bought the product for his wife, and when the technicians visited the address of the complainant to rectify the fault, the complainant did not allow them to attend to it.

This judgment matters as it confirms that a person paying for gifts is a consumer, even if the invoice lists a relative. It affirms local jurisdiction for residents and penalises manufacturers for service delays, establishing that mental agony from poor support warrants significant compensation.

Jagriti Rai works with The Indian Express, where she writes from the vital intersection of law, gender, and society. Working on a dedicated legal desk, she focuses on translating complex legal frameworks into relatable narratives, exploring how the judiciary and legislative shifts empower and shape the consciousness of citizens in their daily lives. Expertise Socio-Legal Specialization: Jagriti brings a critical, human-centric perspective to modern social debates. Her work focuses on how legal developments impact gender rights, marginalized communities, and individual liberties. Diverse Editorial Background: With over 4 years of experience in digital and mainstream media, she has developed a versatile reporting style. Her previous tenures at high-traffic platforms like The Lallantop and Dainik Bhaskar provided her with deep insights into the information needs of a diverse Indian audience. Academic Foundations: Post-Graduate in Journalism from the Indian Institute of Mass Communication (IIMC), India’s premier media training institute. Master of Arts in Ancient History from Banaras Hindu University (BHU), providing her with the historical and cultural context necessary to analyze long-standing social structures and legal evolutions. ... Read More