Legal Clarity On Allegations Over Nandus Visa Issues

Advocate Anuradha Maganti has provided legal clarification regarding the allegations circulating on social media against the UK based Telugu couple Nandu and Madhukar. She addressed…

Advocate Anuradha Maganti has provided legal clarification regarding the allegations circulating on social media against the UK based Telugu couple Nandu and Madhukar.

She addressed several key issues and explained the legal perspective behind the ongoing controversy.

She first clarified that the companies operated by Nandu and Madhukar in London are legitimate and legally registered businesses.

According to her, setting up a limited company in the United Kingdom is a lawful process that is available to anyone who meets the required regulations.

Addressing the recruitment agency at the center of the allegations, she stated that the agency is associated solely with Madhukar and has no connection to Nandu.

She explained that the agency functions only as an intermediary between employers and job seekers. As such, it cannot be held responsible for visa rejections, employment disputes or job losses experienced by applicants.

On the legal front, Advocate Anuradha argued that since Nandu and Madhukar are British passport holders, Indian laws may not directly apply to them in certain matters, depending on the jurisdiction involved.

She also claimed that much of the negative publicity stems from personal grudges held by certain individuals.

According to her, some people are spreading misinformation due to past conflicts, while the actual facts differ from the narrative being promoted online.

Speaking about women’s empowerment, she expressed concern that instead of appreciating a woman who has successfully built and managed a social media channel, some individuals are attempting to defame her. She described this behavior as a sign of negativity within society.

Ad: A lifetime investment for your home and family

In conclusion, she maintained that all activities undertaken by Nandu and Madhukar are being conducted legally and that the allegations circulating on social media are driven primarily by jealousy, resentment and personal bias.

The advocate claims that this slander began after they protected an employee from harassment, leading to retaliation from an individual who was later deported from the UK.