Explained Bribery Plot 5000 Crore Fake Drugs Racket

Gahlawat, who is currently serving as a Regional Director with the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA), had allegedly demanded Rs 3 crore to settle or “fix” an ongoing CBI investigation. The case he allegedly promised to fix was a Rs 5,000-crore counterfeit medicine manufacturing and distribution racket running out of Puducherry.

The roots of the alleged bribery scandal trace back to last year in Puducherry.

Following coordinated raids by local police and the CB-CID, authorities uncovered underground setups manufacturing massive quantities of spurious and adulterated medicines. Huge stockpiles of raw chemical materials, packaging components, and finished counterfeit drug packages mimicking major pharmaceutical brands were seized.

N Raja, a prominent Puducherry-based businessman, was arrested in the case in December last year. The Puducherry Police later found several politicians were allegedly involved, and the investigation was transferred to the CBI.

When the CBI began turning up the heat, Raja allegedly began seeking backchannels to influence senior investigators and get “relief” in the case.

The probe agency busted this alleged secondary criminal network of intermediaries and public servants in June.

On June 8, the CBI registered an FIR against Raja; Pradeep Kumar Singh, an inspector with the Delhi Police Crime Branch’s Southern Range; and Rajkumar who is alleged to have acted as an intermediary.

Earlier, the CBI had arrested the accused Delhi Police Inspector along with six other private persons, which led to the recovery of approximately Rs 25 lakh of trap amount and Rs 90 lakh, along with other incriminating documents, a CBI spokesperson had said.

-Inspector Pradeep allegedly acted as a conduit and assured Raja that the CBI investigation in the counterfeit drugs “scam” could be modified favourably through high-level internal contacts.

-Gahlawat was accused of allegedly hatching a conspiracy in his office to facilitate the payments and getting in touch with other public servants who could “help” the accused persons.

-Rajkumar operated as an alleged middleman between the Delhi Police Inspector and the hawala dealers.

According to the CBI’s submissions in a Delhi court, Gahlawat held a meeting with other co-accused persons in his office on May 14. It was argued by the agency that Gahlawat allegedly demanded Rs 50 lakh as part of illegal gratification from Raja for “exercising his personal influence over a public servant posted in CBI to secure favourable relief”.

The agency claimed that a demand of Rs 3 crore was made from accused Raja, out of which Rs 1 crore advance tranche was delivered. The CBI claimed this money, which was allegedly arranged through hawala transactions, has been recovered.

The agency claimed the payment was allegedly received through Pradeep, through a hawala operator. Rs 25 lakh was allegedly kept at Pradeep’s house. During trap proceedings on June 8, Pradeep and Rajkumar were apprehended with the money.

Where does the investigation stand right now?

The CBI had sought custody of Gahlawat. In its remand papers, it claimed that he needed to be confronted with suspicious transactions and that his custody was needed for unearthing the larger conspiracy by ascertaining the role of other co-accused persons.

A Delhi court Wednesday granted a day’s custody.

But during the hearing, the court asked the CBI why it didn’t question Gahlawat about the “role of CBI officers” in the alleged bribery case.

Special Judge Sushant Changotra of Rouse Avenue Court said, “The answer to queries posed to the IO today makes it apparent that till date, no effort has been made in the investigation as to whether any public servant who was posted in CBI was ever approached by accused Deepak Gahlawat or if he had made any attempt to exercise his personal influence over such public servants. The IO made no endeavour to ascertain as to whether such a person existed or the identity of this public servant. The conduct of the IO in this respect and the responses given by him today are totally unfathomable.”

As per the court order dated July 2, the CBI questioned Gahlawat in detail on Wednesday regarding this particular matter.

The court denied the police request for further custody. Gahlawat is currently in judicial custody.

The CBI has seized digital evidence such as Gahlawat’s phone and other evidence such as bank account statements and is currently investigating the role of other “public servants” by confronting the accused persons with each other, The Indian Express has learnt.