Nose Treatment Paralysis Hospital Doctors Rs 15 Lakh Woman

The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) has held a Ludhiana hospital and two doctors liable for allegedly failing to promptly treat a 36-year-old woman for her severe post-procedure pain and numbness and ordered Rs 15 lakh in compensation.

Commission president Justice A P Sahi and member Bharat Kumar Pandya were hearing a consumer complaint filed by one Deepak Bansal and his wife Kiran Bala against Satguru Pratap Singh Apollo Hospitals, Ludhiana, and three doctors. The complaint related to Kiran Bala’s treatment and post-operative care after she was admitted in September 2011.

“The hospital system itself should have ensured speedier MRI and speedier expert-neuro advise…Our final conclusion is that there is collective lack of urgency with which the team of incharge experts and the hospital’s system could have responded,” the commission said on August 4. It also noted “some lack of transparency and clarity in the doctor’s notes”.

The case began on September 17, 2011, when Kiran Bala noticed unusual leakage of fluid from her nose. She was admitted to the Ludhiana hospital and underwent endoscopic repair for CSF rhinorrhoea. When the leakage recurred, a lumbar drain was placed to assist the treatment. She subsequently developed worsening pain, numbness and weakness in her lower limbs.

The commission’s scrutiny focused on the hours after the lumbar drain was placed. A recovery note at 5.30pm on September 23 recorded discomfort in both lower limbs that had persisted from before the procedure. The record also contained an instruction by Dr Gaurav to “inform dr. Deepinder”.

The hospital maintained that Dr Deepender Singh visited the patient at around 9pm, but the commission noted that the medical record did not document the visit or any advice, treatment or investigation allegedly given by him.

The next morning, Kiran Bala had numbness and weakness in both legs. An MRI was directed at around 10am on September 24 and conducted at 1pm. Its report, received around 4.30pm, showed findings suggestive of spinal thoracic cord myelitis with arachnoid enhancement.

The hospital records showed that weakness progressed to complete paraplegia, with bladder and bowel involvement.

The commission drew a clear distinction between the lumbar drain procedure and the care that followed. It found no evidence that the drain had been negligently inserted or that there had been any deviation from treatment protocol, and also found nothing deficient in the first CSF repair surgery.

However, it held that Kiran Bala’s repeated complaints of pain and increasing numbness should have prompted immediate expert consultation and investigation.

Noting that motor power in her lower limbs had already fallen to one out of five by the morning of September 24, the commission said the treating surgeon and anaesthetist should have ensured the resident doctors and nursing staff were prepared to recognise signs of sensory loss and seek urgent expert opinion.

It awarded Rs 15 lakh as lump-sum compensation, with 6 per cent interest from the date of the complaint until payment. The hospital will bear 90 per cent of the liability, while Dr Deepender Singh and Dr Gaurav Kuthiala will each bear 5 per cent. The hospital was also directed to pay Rs 25,000 as costs. The order has to be complied with by October 4. If the amount remains unpaid after that date, interest on the outstanding amount will rise to 9 per cent from October 4 onwards.

Hospitals cannot be held liable merely because a patient develops a rare complication after treatment. But if they fail to respond promptly to warning signs, delay investigations or specialist consultation, or do not closely monitor a deteriorating patient, they can still be held accountable for deficiency in service.

For consumer-related grievances, individuals may contact the consumer helpline in their respective states and union territories or call the National Consumer Helpline at 1915 for assistance.

Insurer rejects ovarian cyst surgery claim over ‘waiting period’, woman wins Rs 2.6 lakh

No refund months after ‘cancelling’ mattress order, Himachal man wins Rs 19,000 payout

Vineet Upadhyay is an Assistant Editor with The Indian Express (Digital), where he leads specialized coverage of the Indian judicial system. Expertise Specialized Legal Authority: Vineet has spent the better part of his career analyzing the intricacies of the law. His expertise lies in "demystifying" judgments from the Supreme Court of India, various High Courts, and District Courts. His reporting covers a vast spectrum of legal issues, including: Constitutional & Civil Rights: Reporting on landmark rulings regarding privacy, equality, and state accountability. Criminal Justice & Enforcement: Detailed coverage of high-profile cases involving the Enforcement Directorate (ED), NIA, and POCSO matters. Consumer Rights & Environmental Law: Authoritative pieces on medical negligence compensation, environmental protection (such as the "living person" status of rivers), and labor rights. Over a Decade of Professional Experience: Prior to joining The Indian Express, he served as a Principal Correspondent/Legal Reporter for The Times of India and held significant roles at The New Indian Express. His tenure has seen him report from critical legal hubs, including Delhi and Uttarakhand. ... Read More